Cross-jurisdictional Data Transfer in Health Research: Stakeholder Perceptions on the Role of Law
A qualitative study conducted by M4 researchers reveals insights into stakeholders’ perceptions of the role of law in cross-national health data research.
Large data-intensive health research programmes benefit from collaboration amongst researchers who may be located in different institutions and international contexts. However, complexities in navigating privacy frameworks and data protection laws across various jurisdictions pose significant challenges to researchers seeking to share or transfer data outside of institutional boundaries. Furthermore, research on the awareness of data protection and privacy laws amongst stakeholders is limited.
A qualitative study, which drew from a larger project in Singapore, revealed insights into stakeholders’ perceptions of the role of law in cross-national health data research. It was conducted by Module 4 researchers. Stakeholders in the study demonstrated a range of perceptions regarding the role of data protection law in governing the collection and transfer of health data for research. The main criticisms included inadequate legal protection to data and lack of uniformed data protection standards.
Despite these criticisms, participants recognised the importance of data protection law in supporting cross-border data transfers and proposed measures to improve perceived limitations of existing laws. These measures include strengthening existing legal framework, establishing contractual agreements and imposing severe punishments for data misuse.
Image source: Vecteezy
Chan, H.Y., Toh, H.J. & Lysaght, T. Cross-jurisdictional Data Transfer in Health Research: Stakeholder Perceptions on the Role of Law. ABR (2024).
external page https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-024-00283-8